Search for: "Stephens v. State" Results 1061 - 1080 of 6,506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2007, 10:32 am
It does so in two principal ways: first, by prohibiting the federal courts from applying the ordinary principles of stare decisis in deciding habeas cases involving prisoners held in state custody, thereby interfering with the federal courts' normal adjudicatory process; and second, by requiring federal courts to give effect to incorrect state rulings that, in the federal courts' independent judgment, violate the Constitution. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
Iqbal and Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:20 am by Joshua Matz
United States, in which the state has asked the Court to review the Ninth Circuit’s decision blocking enforcement of four provisions of S.B. 1070, its controversial immigration law. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:30 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v McFadden Court Discusses Conviction Against the Weight of the Evidence. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am by INFORRM
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Poppy Weston-Davies
 Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Kagan did not accord with the concept of the “strict scrutiny” test. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 2:58 am
Bush and Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by Ken
For a sense of just how badly wrong Marc is about the scope of the First Amendment, consider the recent dismissal of the twitter-stalking case in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:22 pm by John D. Graham
” Twenty years later, in Whitman v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:36 pm
Espinosa turned over his check to the Dept. of State on Thursday, in the amount of $5,843.00. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
  At the Council of State Governments, Lisa Soronen looks at the big picture, with brief previews of the issues that could affect states, while Adam Liptak of The New York Times previews Holt v. [read post]