Search for: "Stone v. Stone"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 3,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2014, 7:00 am
In Jackson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 1:42 am
The IPCom guidance are provided for readers' convenience at the end of this post.The IPCom factors have since been applied in Actavis v Pharmacia [2014] EWHC 2265 (stay was ordered), and Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences [2016] EWHC 313 (stay was not ordered) (IPKat post here).David Stone (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge), applied the IPCom guidance to the fact of the case in Coloplast v Salts. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:50 am
(quoting Stone v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 4:00 am
Enge Farms Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:31 pm
Stone's SSRN page.Happy Disability History Awareness Month! [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 11:58 am
Ginn v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:00 am
Effler v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:40 am
In the case of Artistic Stone v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:31 pm
Stone's SSRN page.Happy Disability History Awareness Month! [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:39 am
In 2012, after revising the construction plans, petitioner filed a new application for site plan approval and submitted architectural drawings indicating that the exterior would be “½ Brick Veneer Siding” and that the veneer material would be “Boral Stone Products Cultured Stone Brick Veneer Antique Red. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am
The main cases here are Cofemel — Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV and Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech/Get2Get. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am
The main cases here are Cofemel — Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV and Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech/Get2Get. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 5:39 am
Because "[t]he primary justification for the exclusionary rule" is "the deterrence of police conduct that violates" a defendant's constitutional rights, Stone v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 7:38 am
A recent issue of Rolling Stone named Martin Scorcese's The Last Waltz the #1 music DVD of all time. [1] It chronicles late-60s alt-country rock stars The Band's final concert, interspersed with interviews and commentary chronicling their impact on the music scene. [2] The magnificent film, however, neglects to answer one nagging, persistent inquiry: why did they break up? [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 11:19 am
Stone v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
” Back in 1999, in Bernstein v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:07 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:35 am
This happened in the recent case of Smith v Carpetright plc, heard by Regional Cost Judge Sparrow in Norwich County Court.The Claimant had entered into a CFA with Godfrey Morgan solicitors. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:56 am
A Manhattan Judicial Hearing Officer recently ruled in People v. [read post]
