Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 14,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2008, 7:53 am
The case is LaRue v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:02 pm
That advance directive states: “If at such times there is no reasonable expectation of my recovery from extreme physical or mental disability, I direct that I be allowed to die and not be kept alive by ventilators, artificial means or ‘heroic measures. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
After Bush v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:03 pm
First, Howlett v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 6:24 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:42 pm
United States, No. 16-327, to be argued March 28, 2017Issue: Whether it is always irrational for a noncitizen defendant with longtime legal resident status and extended familial and business ties to the United States to reject a plea offer notwithstanding strong evidence of guilt when the plea would result in mandatory and permanent deportation.Argument preview: Immigration, ineffective assistance and plea bargainingTurner v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:35 pm
At oral argument, both sides had strong policy arguments that the Washington Supreme Court will have to weigh carefully in their decision. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Additional Resources: Hampton v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:27 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 8:18 am
Was termination too strong a remedy? [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
De Leon v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 8:02 am
Trademark Policing v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:21 pm
Strong Although the decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Bus. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:58 pm
When the Supreme Court decided McCleskey v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
United States, 459 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972); see also, Black v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm
Although the Court in Day v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:45 pm
The court began its analysis by first stating that a “strong presumption of validity” exists in zoning amendments. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
