Search for: "Swift v. Swift"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2017, 5:50 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction in Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm
But if Texas admitted as much, the law would have met a swift and near-certain demise in federal court. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
See Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:16 am
Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 2:30 am
Terry v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:47 am
In Adams v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
For example, Taylor Swift has trade mark protection in Australia covering goods such as sound recordings, fragrances, clothing and footwear, and services such as live musical performances, websites, contests and fan-clubs. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:26 am
Last week the court ruled on the issue in The Hebrew University of Jerusalem v General Motors LLC. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 8:34 pm
" No one is better at that than Swift Boat Johnnie. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm
Clause 4 is a ‘reasonable publication’ defence not a ‘responsible publication’ defence reflecting the latest common law as outlined by Lord Brown in Flood v Times. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 1:32 pm
Yesterday, in Coalition for TJ v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm
But if Texas admitted as much, the law would have met a swift and near-certain demise in federal court. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 12:45 pm
Since the Credit Crunch may be a big spoiler for many people's Winterval celebrations this year, the temptation to fake it may be great, so warnings of this kind are particularly necessary.Meanwhile, Merpel has been doing some swift research into the Credit Crunch. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
It is more antidemocratic than impeachment, because the impeachers and convicters, representatives and senators, are themselves democratically elected and subject to swift democratic punishment. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 10:21 am
There has been some judicial support for this principle in Australia, most notably Justice McCallum in Bleyer v Google Inc, but there has also been judicial criticism and resistance. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:09 am
The Florida Supreme Court ruling in Coleman v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 8:52 am
Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., joined the growing ranks of members of Congress in issuing a warning to the Supreme Court: reaffirm Roe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
See Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:21 am
Intervening in cases where they should stay out--Roe v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:00 pm
MAURIAT" for Musical InstrumentsPrecedential No. 42: TTAB Reverses 2(a) False Connection Refusal of "MARIA CALLAS" for JewelryTTAB Rules That "SHINNECOCK" Marks for Cigarettes Suggest a False Connection with the Shinnecock Indian NationSection 2(b) - flag, coat of arms, insignia:TTAB Reverses 2(b) Refusal of Mark Containing Portion of Canadian FlagSection 2(d) - likelihood of confusion:"CRASH DUMMIES" Mark Survives Abandonment Claim, TTAB Sustains 2(d) Opposition… [read post]
