Search for: "T " Results 1061 - 1080 of 881,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2008, 5:04 am
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v T [2008] EWCA Civ 199; [2008] WLR (D) 91 “A supervision order made pursuant to s 31 of and para 6 of Sch 3 to the Children Act 1989 had an initial life of 12 months and could be extended for a further two years maximum. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 5:59 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
INDIANAPOLIS, Indiana (December 22, 2017): More changes are coming to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, as District Judge William T. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
For this reason, the composition of the OD violated A 19(2), first sentence.[4] Violations of A 19(2) were considered to be substantial procedural violations which led to a remittal of the case under A 111(1) and to the reimbursement of the appeal fee in several cases (see decisions T 251/88, T 939/91, T 382/92, T 476/95, T 838/02, T 1349/10).[5] The Board is aware that in two of the cases mentioned above (T 251/88 and T… [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 4:45 am
Today's riddle:If a seven-year-old gets out of school for the year on the second Friday in June and doesn't start second grade until September 5, how does PunditMom stay on top of work, home and punditry, not to mention things that Oh, the Joys or CrankMama are more comfortable talking about? [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:16 am
T with Nancy Reagan, Christmas 1983Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Is this a WYHA? [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Such a warning was however introduced subsequently in the light of a number of problems, as reported in T 781/04 [10.3], i.e. as a consequence of a “lacuna” in the system (see also T 991/04 [31]). [5.4] This consideration however does not apply in the present case since at the time the applicant submitted the “notice of appeal” the warnings the absence of which was referred to in T 781/04 and T 991/04 were in place both on the website and… [read post]
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
24 May 2023, 10:35 am by Bill Marler
My new obsession, T-shirts will be available at the time of the movie premiere along with photos on the red carpet. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Hence, the decision T 990/96 might be relevant for the present case. [3.4.3] Decision T 142/06 [3.27-3.3.2] refers to T 990/96. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
An auxiliary request is a request that applies only if the main request or the auxiliary request of higher rank is not allowed (see T 153/85, T 79/89, T 169/96 and T 1105/96). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
T 483/90, T 613/91 and T 1/97[5.2] (a) In T 483/90 the appeal was filed by the opponent without specifying its address; with respect to the name, even if it was not completely clear, it seems that there was no deficiency. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
SHUT DOWN ORDERS DIDN’T IMPACT OFFICE SPACE? [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Given there was no wrongdoing, and absent an intent to defraud, the AD1 thought no “alter ego” or “piercing” analysis applied here.And, finally, given that the shareholders weren't “strangers to the lease,” a claim for “tortious interference,” couldn't be asserted against them, particularly since “their actions were driven by a bona fide economic interest — namely, the interest in not having defendant tenant… [read post]