Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 49,482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
Department of Child Safety (Indian Child Welfare Act – Expert Witnesses)People in Interest of E.T. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:38 am
Before the 2003 law, injured people got the benefit of their insurance. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:57 am
We've been asked two questions repeatedly since the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 8:09 am
Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County: People v. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 8:09 am
Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County: People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
Council v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
Reasonable expectations can never be banned from the law, but they must be domesticated, where their primary role is to facilitate cooperation between people who otherwise are unable to coordinate their social behaviors. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:06 pm
The dissent says that is not the law: the Board still has discretion, so its their call, even if the statutory qualifications for release are satisfied.Both positions are articulated extremely well: for the majority, by Justice Codrington, and for the dissent, by Justice Menetrez.I'll leave the merits to the respective authors, since I can't improve on either very much. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:47 pm
See whether trial courts (and other panels in the Court of Appeal) agree with the most recent case -- Justice Premo's -- and agree that the prior case is old, bad law. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:42 pm
Especially when you're listening to this stuff exactly as it happened.On the intellectual front, however, I will say that the opinion is definitely interesting, and would the underlying dispute would also make for a decent law review article. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:14 pm
"The trial court found defendant had suffered five prior felony convictions under the Three Strikes law. . . . [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 2:02 pm
Instead, after his brother was stabbed, Solorio told his neighbors that he would 'handle matters on his own rather than approach law enforcement' and that he intended to ""cap" Ramos, "blast him," and "kill him". [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:43 pm
But I think it's a tough question how far the police are able to go when all they have on you is that you're carrying a personal amount of weed, which may well be -- and in the vast majority of case, is (I suspect) -- legal under California law. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 3:08 pm
The juvenile court is then to impose an appropriate disposition within its discretion under juvenile court law. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
Defendants left the scene.After law enforcement officers arrived at the cul-de-sac, Diane described her assailants. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
Is that really insufficient evidence as a matter of law that the guy in fact committed a hit and run, which is what the Court of Appeal in fact held? [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:31 am
The one strike law doesn't, in fact, apply to him, so the Court of Appeal remands for resentencing. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 10:14 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
It was legal for 48 years straight—from the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
