Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 55,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
This was said to have caused harm, particularly to children and young people. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 4:33 pm
Alvarez v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 12:39 pm
The Court of Appeal reverses.Justice Yegan argues that while such a dismissal "surely would have a deterrent effect upon law enforcement agents," it is "too drastic and would be 'judicial overkill.'" The Court of Appeal holds that the exclusion of the overheard communications and any derivative evidence is instead sufficient, as such a lesser remedy would "deter over-zealous law enforcement agents as there is nothing to… [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 12:21 pm
But, again, these are state law issues. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:08 am
Humanitarianism v. the State: Migration as an issue of national security or human security. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:54 am
Public lewdness, as defined by New York law, involves engaging in lewd behavior in a public place or in a manner that’s visible to the public. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:43 pm
Kent discusses Hall v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:17 pm
And based upon its discussion, that does indeed seem to be the law of California. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 1:42 pm
Haeger v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
In Olmstead v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Paul v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:33 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:52 pm
Eli-Tpitahatohek Tpaskuwakonol Waponahkik (How we, Native people, reflect on the law in the Dawnland). [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
When Ed Blum brought Evenwel v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
When Ed Blum brought Evenwel v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:09 pm
v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:57 pm
Over at the Lawyers, Guns, and Money blog, Robert Farley has an interesting post taking me to task for ignoring the siege of Harfleur in my discussion of Henry V and the law of armed conflict. [read post]
