Search for: "Trademark Attorney"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 10,810
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2019, 12:45 pm
Licensed Attorney for Foreign Trademark Applicants and Registrants. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 10:07 am
Plaintiffs seek a preliminary and permanent injunction preventing Callaway’s use of Roger Cleveland’s name on the clubs, in addition to unspecified monetary damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 6:23 pm
Please contact your Sheppard Mullin attorney contact for additional information [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:57 am
South Bend, Indiana - Indiana trademark attorneys for Plaintiff Barrington Music Products, Inc. of Niles, Michigan filed a trademark infringement lawsuit in the Northern District of Indiana. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:44 am
• Common Law Unfair Competition • Common Law Trademark Infringement Plaintiffs ask the federal court for damages, injunctive relief, costs and attorneys' fees. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
Plaintiffs seek costs, attorneys' fees and damages, including enhanced damages, as well as injunctive relief. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:12 pm
First, with the granting of a dubious Letter of Protest, then with a registration refusal being made by the Examining Attorney who had previously seen no trademark conflict, and most recently with the Managing Attorney at the USPTO taking over the file to reinforce the likelihood of confusion refusal and add even more substantive bases for refusal. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
The panel to discuss this weighty topic included the following: Marc Levy, Partner, Seed IP Law Group (moderator) Tom McCarthy, Senior Professor, USF School of Law (author of the “multi-volume pre-eminent treatise on trademark law” called McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition) Lorelei Ritchie, Administrative Trademark Judge, USPTO TTAB Ron Coleman, Partner, Archer & Greiner Makalika Naholowaa, Attorney, Corporate, External, & Legal… [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 6:19 am
The TMEP is published to provide trademark examining attorneys in the USPTO, trademark applicants, and attorneys and representatives for trademark applicants with a reference work on the practices and procedures relative to prosecution of applications to register marks in the USPTO. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:49 pm
Once a Final Refusal has issued in an Office Action, a trademark applicant can file a request for reconsideration with the Examining Attorney, file an appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board)”, or the applicant can file both a request for reconsideration and an appeal simultaneously. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:40 am
No attorney-client relationship shall exist prior to the signing of a retainer agreement. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 10:04 am
Patent & Trademark Office and has withstood a cancellation proceeding at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:00 am
-licensed attorney has been appointed to represent the trademark owner. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
The trademark examining attorney determined the marks were not protectable because they were generic, or alternately, descriptive but lacking secondary meaning. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 3:58 pm
The Examining Attorney refused the application under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act citing the registration for NAUGLES owned by the Respondent. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 3:58 pm
The Examining Attorney refused the application under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act citing the registration for NAUGLES owned by the Respondent. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 7:52 am
Given the foregoing, it is important that you consult with attorneys experienced in the space to avoid NFT-related litigation. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 7:10 am
If you believe your trademark has been infringed upon, you may want to consult with a trademark attorney to discuss your legal options. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:59 pm
" Trademark Attorneys representing LMFAO have recently filed four trademark applications with the U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:33 pm
Indianapolis; IN - Trademark attorneys for Australian Gold, LLC of Indianapolis, Indiana filed a trademark infringement suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging Devoted Creations, Inc. of Oldsmar, Florida infringed trademark registration no. 4089695 for the mark MUST HAVE, which has been registered with the US Trademark Office. [read post]
