Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Internet and Social Media In the case of UFC-Que Choisir v Google (Judgment in French) the TGI Paris has ruled that 38 of the clauses in Google’s “Terms of use” and “Confidentiality Policy” were unfair and hence null and void. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Underwood, "Road to Nowhere or Jurisprudential U-Turn? [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
See, Roth v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
– San Miguel Brewing International Limited v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
Australia’s highest court emphatically rejected the relevance of reputation in either the allegedly infringing or infringed mark is relevant to the assessment of deceptive similarity, ruling that PROTOX and “instant BOTOX alternative” do not infringe the registered trade mark BOTOX. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
This, the Commissioner pointed out, was exactly the type of proof that the district would have been expected to introduce in a Section 3020-a disciplinary hearing.Rejecting the district’s argument that Irving’s transfer was for the good of the district and thus not disciplinary in nature, the Commissioner said this theory misses the mark. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Rees, -U .S. ,128 S. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:56 am
A trooper in a marked police car followed Mr. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
” 12 U. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:34 am
U bald piece of shit die mother fucker. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Spy in the Crowd: How User’s Privacy Is Getting Affected with the Integration of Internet of Thing’s Devices, Amit Kumar Tyagi and Shamila M, Lingaya’s University – Department of Computer Science and Engineering and Malla-Reddy Engineering College, Hyderabad, India. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:39 am
Kaiser, 323 U.S. 471, 484, n. 2 (1945) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:30 am
The court’s decision in Elkind v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
U. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 8:56 am
But here's a recent example, from Hoover v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
There's anger in those. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 9:09 pm
Takushi (1992) and Anderson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
Today’s conservative high court justices have incrementally dismantled certain tenets of the free speech legacy of the Warren Court – what with their more than occasional disfavor for overbreadth challenges, their approval of public-forum restrictions via “content-neutral” time, place, and manner regulations, and the Robert Court’s more recent handiwork in Holder, Attorney General v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm
The Daily Telegraph had an article marking the anniversary: “EU ‘right to be forgotten’ one year on” Facebook abuses European privacy law by tracking people without their consent, Belgium’s privacy watchdog has said. [read post]
