Search for: "U.S. v. Smart*"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
UK judge declines Samsung's job offer, invalidates three 3G standard-essential patents in Apple case
7 Mar 2013, 5:21 am
Most recently a Samsung lawsuit against Apple's voiceover feature (which matters a great deal to blind and vision-impaired users) was stayed.Justice Floyd appears unlikely to follow in Sir Robin Jacob's footsteps and work for Samsung as an expert witness in USITC investigations.The ITC has a deadline later today for a final ruling on Samsung's request for a U.S. import ban against Apple. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:56 pm
This week, the U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 2:46 am
But what the EU should focus on is what its highest court decided in Huawei v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:08 am
Challenging Human Gene Patents Before the Supreme Court This week, we went to the U.S. [read post]
Verizon, advertising agencies and Ford want to go to bat for Judge Posner at Federal Circuit hearing
2 Aug 2013, 6:49 am
On September 11, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will conduct a hearing on the Apple v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 8:02 pm
Obviously a $22 million reimbursement is a small thing compared to the magnitude of this dispute, and the May 1 date will be after the aforementioned trial of the second Apple v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:14 pm
(Apple saw it on sale, apparently because of direct imports by resellers such as Amazon, and reserved the right to bring claims should it find out about any related commercial activity by Samsung).While the Northern District of California has permissive rules concerning amended infringement contentions and Magistrate Judge Grewal, who is in charge of evidentiary issues in the two Apple v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 1:56 am
This morning -- the day after Justice Floyd in the UK declared three of Samsung's standard-essential patents (SEPs) invalid -- Judge Andreas Voss ("Voß" in German) ordered a retrial, scheduled for July 26, 2013, in a Samsung v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Lefkowitz & Steven Menashi, Brief of Amici Curiae Former Justice Department Officials in Support of Petitioners in Zubik v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Adell, Razing the Forest to Kill a Tree: EEOC V. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 7:01 am
About a year ago, the Competition Commission of India had expressed concern over Ericsson's royalty base.In March it turned out that Ericsson had asked Micromax for substantially higher royalty rates than another local company, Saral.This year the Competition Commission of India launched a second investigation of Ericsson's standard-essential patent licensing practices (in particular, certain conditions it tried to impose on an implementer of a standard).Here's the court order on… [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 12:17 am
Last months I watched an Ericsson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Begging the question, does the next age in software protection belong to copyright (see Apple v Psystar, Oracle v Google)? [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
For further background, see also LTN‘s March 12 analysis of a Seventh Circuit decision, U.S. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:38 pm
U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:54 am
Lemay and Imran ChaudhriA few days after the Apple v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
September 20, 1987Robert Bork said that serving on the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:19 pm
” Immediately after the Mar-a-Lago phone call, Flynn called Kislyak to ask “that Russia not escalate the situation and only respond to the U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 6:08 am
" Snap Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Bolden v. [read post]
