Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 3,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
Varsity Brands, Inc., which held that a feature of a useful article is copyrightable if it can be perceived as a separately protectable work, observing that the ruling gives “a V for victory to the dominant provider of cheerleader uniforms for schools, colleges, and spirit teams, ruling that some of its uniform designs were protected under federal copyright law. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 12:20 pm
Ohio’s Dram Shop Act embodies that general common law rule.) [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 12:40 pm
The Tenth Circuit Court ruled in favor of the local school district, applying several precedents of that Circuit Court following the “bare minimum” approach. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 12:40 pm
The Tenth Circuit Court ruled in favor of the local school district, applying several precedents of that Circuit Court following the “bare minimum” approach. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 7:45 am
It sued Star Athletica (also in the market for cheerleading uniforms) for copyright infringement, but the District Court held that Varsity Brands' designs could not be conceptually or physically separated from the uniforms and were therefore ineligible for copyright protection. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:41 am
Although this is an important decision for employers, attorneys for the workers plan to appeal this lower district court decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 6:02 pm
A Hispanic paramedic who was placed on administrative detail after refusing to comply with the fire department’s mandatory wellness program—based on his belief that it violated his privacy—failed to defeat summary judgment on his Title VII national origin discrimination claim because his purported comparator was not similarly situated and the department’s decision was not pretextual, ruled a federal district court in Texas. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Far from using the breathing space that the Court afforded them to desegregate in an orderly fashion that allowed white southerners to buy into the ruling, politician [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:50 am
In the next two years, the Beijing IP Court aims to significantly expand the number of precedents and make them an indispensable part of judicial opinions. 2.1 The nature and hierarchy of IP precedents are made clear Two main guidelines under preparation are the Procedural Guidelines for Applying Precedents in IP Trials (Draft) and the Norms for Uniformity of Advocacy, Trial and Ruling of the Beijing IP Court (Draft)). [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Accordingly, the District Court remanded the action to the state court. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court’s ruling and dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
District Court for Northern California. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:41 am
§1961, has been uniform. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 3:08 am
The Ninth Circuit found that the District Court erred in ruling that PMRG failed to present evidence to support an assumed violation rate of at least two-meal and two-rest breaks per workweek per employee. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:02 am
One clear exception is that employees are totally prohibited from participating in political activity while in uniform. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm
Or it could reduce the incentive for litigants to forum shop—and the ability of district judges to “forum sell”—by mandating increased procedural uniformity in patent cases. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 6:15 am
Damages discovery in patent cases is usually contentious, expensive, and non-uniform in application by the courts. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
” Without any explanation, the court enjoined this provision even though it would not go into effect for nearly four months; the state of Washington conceded during the district court proceedings that this provision “does not necessarily require immediate injunction. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 4:58 am
On August 12, 2009, the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued a judgment enforcing a $6.5 million dollar Chinese judgment against an American corporate defendant under California’s version of the Uniform Foreign Money Judgments Recognition Act and in 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:51 am
Another area that requires reform is German civil procedural law - under the current rules, the old adage "lose the secret or lose the case" applies. [read post]
