Search for: "UNKNOWN PERSONS AND INTERESTED PARTIES" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,819
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2015, 7:38 am by Ken White
I have obtained the attached Court Order prohibiting Reason from notifying any third party about the subpoena. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
You can, if you are interested, read more about the case in the news stories you can find here and here. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 10:42 am
They fill orders from unknown locations, apparently outside Canada. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
  You can, if you are interested, read more about the case in the news stories you can find hereand here. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 6:10 am by Joy Waltemath
Further, the parties conceded that if she sincerely believed her religion required that she wear a headscarf, it was a “religious practice. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:53 pm by Tessa Shepperson
A document of title Under the Law of Property Act 1925, a deed is needed to transfer or ‘convey’ an interest in land from one person to another. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  Among other things he heard a bang-up presentation on genomics and personalized (also known as “precision”) medicine from Paige Sensenbrenner. [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:49 pm
It is simply hearing a case the first time that all concerned parties are before a court of competent jurisdiction. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:29 pm by familoo
A person commits rape if he intentionally penetrates the v*gina, an*s or mouth of another person (male or female) with the p*nis and that other person does not consent to the penetration and the penetrator does not reasonably believe that that other person is consenting a person consents if he or she agrees by choice and has the freedom and capacity to make that choice the complainant is taken not to have consented unless sufficient evidence is adduced to… [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:39 am
 This has already given us interesting and striking decisions from the Patents Court  (also here) and the Court of Appeal in England, and also the US Supreme Court. [read post]
16 May 2015, 4:44 pm by The Book Review Editor
In cases of genuinely novel or unknown biological agents, or agents that spread with great rapidity, of course, these measures are far from assured to defend against the attack. [read post]
16 May 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
 The injunction, which was to prevent harassment from photographers, was granted simply against “persons unknown”, since she could not name the photographers in question. [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:35 am
  At most, the evidence cited by the government suggests that Congress assumed, in light of the expectation of secrecy, that persons whose information was targeted by a § 215 order would rarely even know of such orders, and therefore that judicial review at the behest of such persons was a non‐ issue. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm by Brian E. Barreira
  “If the settlor-beneficiary creates a remainder interest in another person, then the settlor-beneficiary’s creditors will not be able to reach the remainder interest if the trustee cannot reach the corpus for the settlor-beneficiary’s benefit. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm by Brian E. Barreira
  “If the settlor-beneficiary creates a remainder interest in another person, then the settlor-beneficiary’s creditors will not be able to reach the remainder interest if the trustee cannot reach the corpus for the settlor-beneficiary’s benefit. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:18 am by Robert D. Durham
The Court noted that the restrictions on the political parties infringed the rights of party members to speak freely and inform themselves about election matters, and did not advance a compelling state interest in doing so. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:02 am by Christopher G. Hill
There are many unknowns in this nascent field that undoubtedly will be fleshed out over time. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am by John McFarland
Fowler is apparently to point to Texas Railroad Commission records that list well locations as “unknown,” and use that as “proof” that ownership of the mineral and royalty interests in the land where the well is located is “unknown. [read post]