Search for: "US v. CLARK "
Results 1061 - 1080
of 3,120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
The well-known High Court judge, who took the audience carefully through various key cases on the topic (such as the CJEU Lindt case (C-529/07) and the Redbull v Sun Mark case ([2012] EWHC 1929 (Ch)), focussed specifically on the link between intention to use and the requirement for the EUTM holder not to register the trade mark in ‘bad faith. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 9:06 pm
See US v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
Part of the expense of bringing an appeal is the cost of preparing the appellate record to be used by the appellate court. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am
The appeal to the Supreme Court is due to be heard by Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm
In Nationwide v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm
Social Uses of TM Stephanie Plamondon Bair, Clark Asay, and LaReina Hingson Early stage research on use of “TM” in casual social discourse. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
In the Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 11:20 am
Thomas Law Review have put together a symposium next weekend (November 12-13, 2010) entitled Bush v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:49 pm
Clark County Sch. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:53 am
j2 Global Communications Inc v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 2:12 pm
Advocate v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am
On 8 to 10 May 2012 the Supreme Court (Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson) heard Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against decision that he should provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 5:29 am
S. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:01 am
The closest authority found was Clark v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
This week, the Supreme Court will consider the linked appeals of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs which are to be heard on Wednesday 6 and Thursday 7 July 2011 by Lords Hope, Walker, Mance, Clarke and Wilson. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
Readers will remember that in Fenty v Arcadia both the High Court and the Court of Appeal noted how image rights as such do not exist in that country [see here].With regard to Italian law, one might consider whether the limitation - confirmed by the Turin court - of the lawfulness of the unauthorized use of one's own image to public interest scenarios is fully compliant with Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:10 pm
Bolchos v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:39 am
In an article titled PANEL I: KSR V. [read post]
