Search for: "US v. Crawford" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2008, 3:36 pm
The use of her statement, in her absence, violated his right to challenge her evidence, Giles’ lawyers contended, relying upon the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 11:24 pm
Massachussetts (07-591), which will decide whether a forensic lab report is "testimonial" evidence subject to the "Confrontation Clause" in the US Constitution, as set forth in the Crawford decision. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 4:40 pm
They also note that the language in their own Carafano v Metrosplash.com case (libel) was too broad. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 6:57 am
  To close the week, the Ninth Circuit applied its newly-described wisdom in US v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:38 pm
Here's the QP:Whether a state forensic analyst's laboratory report prepared for use in a criminal prosecution is "testimonial" evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause as set forth in Crawford v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:17 pm
The Supreme Court today granted cert. in FOX v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 11:34 am
Susan Crawford and Scotusblog and Slate’s new law blog, Convictions, all have more. * Most famously, Bono, who said (and I quote): This is really, really fucking brilliant. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
Massachusetts Issue: Whether a state forensic analyst's laboratory report prepared for use in a criminal prosecution is "testimonial" evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause as set forth in Crawford v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 3:44 am
MassachusettsQuestion Presented: Whether a state forensic analyst's laboratory report prepared for use in a criminal prosecution is "testimonial" evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause as set forth in Crawford v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
 On March 10, Maryland's highest court addressed how prosecutors can get around blank">Crawford v. [read post]