Search for: "US v. London"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 3,700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
So, if the charge did not secure a genuine debt and was entered into for the purpose of defrauding Mr V's creditors, it was a sham in the sense set out in Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd [1967] 2 QB 786. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
So, if the charge did not secure a genuine debt and was entered into for the purpose of defrauding Mr V's creditors, it was a sham in the sense set out in Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd [1967] 2 QB 786. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:11 pm
As we mentioned in our prior post, the Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:46 am
In Cape Flattery Limited v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
Elsewhere, PatLit notes the latest stage in the fascinating dispute between Vringo and ZTE over the "yes-it-is, no-it-isn't" patent infringement by sort-of-adhering to a technical standard, announces the British guidelines on the implementation of a Bolar-style defence to patent infringement claim for the benefit of researchers and explains a decision in which a US Federal Court sticks closely to the US Supreme Court's recent ruling on computer-implemented… [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:35 pm
", Daniel, London and "Your advice, support, knowledge and listening ear have always been very much appreciated by us both. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
In 2003, in Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 12:01 am
Henry v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 3:21 pm
For a) the authority relied on Nipa Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2000] 1 WLR 306, in particular, Sedley LJ’s statement that that s 175(3) stood apart from s 175(1) and (2), and that they could not be read together. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
Carrington and Rohan v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:02 pm
This whole concept promulgated into the Kelo v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 4:49 pm
Accepted applicants will be informed by 20 February 2024.Practicalities and funding:The workshop will take place on 9 May 2024 at Royal Holloway, University of London in Egham, Surrey. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 6:13 am
According to the decision, the nutritional benefit is insufficient for additional IP protection for a second medical use patent.Rose Hughes also reported on the decision Sanofi v Amgen, UPC_CFI_1/2023, focusing on the very first revocation before the UPC. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 9:21 am
In addition, the circular encourages councils to use the MA judgment to appeal any FTT decisions based on Article 14 disability discrimination. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
| How cool is TMView | The "crowded field" in trade mark law | Genetic patents | US Court of Appeal for the 2nd Circuit and Google Books. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
UK information is available here; more detailed US data can be found here. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 7:12 am
Adler & Sons, LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:44 pm
City of New London, upholding takings for private "economic development. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm
Events Please let us know if there are any events which we should be drawing to the attention of our readers. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:08 am
These two papers are: V. [read post]
