Search for: "United States v. Alaska" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2008, 3:45 pm
8-1-2008 National:Abstract: In 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued its only two opinions regarding the constitutionality of sex offender registration and notification statutes. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 2:43 pm
This is the key part of how the court resolved the ex post facto claim in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 12:52 am
The United States Surpeme Court, its makeup another Bush Legacy, has recently breathed life into the preemption defense, with its ruling in Riegel v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:26 pm
  Exxon spent $2.1 billion in cleaning up the spill; settled a civil action by the United States and Alaska for $900 million; and paid another $303 million in voluntary payments to private parties. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:41 pm
” The rule also states that “[i]nterest in cases arising in a court of the United States is allowed at the interest rate authorized by law. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:26 pm by Liskow & Lewis
  Exxon spent $2.1 billion in cleaning up the spill; settled a civil action by the United States and Alaska for $900 million; and paid another $303 million in voluntary payments to private parties. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:30 pm
Brief amicus curiae of United States (recommending holding of petition pending decision in MetLife v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:49 pm
United States Supreme Court Sets 1:1 Ratio for Punitive Damage Awards under Federal Maritime Law and Reduces $2.5 Billion Award in Exxon Valdez Class Action to $500 Million, Ending 20-year Class Action Fight The United States Supreme Court issued a stunning ruling yesterday, holding that a punitive damage to compensatory damage ratio of 1:1 is a "fair upper limit" in federal maritime cases. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
State, 590 P.2d 432, 434 (Alaska 1979); Mackey v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, et al. and Alaska v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:18 pm
United States 12-18-1967Question:Does the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures require the police to obtain a search warrant in order to wiretap a public pay phone? [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]