Search for: "United States v. Gross"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2016, 10:40 am
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 12:42 pm
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:30 am
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Instead, the court determined that it must apply the two-prong test announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
United States (1998, in which Justice Breyer wrote for the majority) that first advanced the constitutional theory adopted by the Court in Apprendi v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
United States, 279 U.S. 151, 49 S. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:53 pm
On July 21, 2014, in Felczer v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:30 am
The court discussed that there are three different approaches to the problem of deviation in the United States; 1) the "strict" or "conversion" rule, 2) the "liberal" rule, and 3) the "minor deviation" rule. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 11:56 am
For 22 years, since the money laundering statutes enactment in 1986, courts have construed "proceeds" to mean gross receipts and not net profits of illegal activity consistent with the original intent of Congress.But in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 10:52 am
For 22 years, since the money laundering statutes enactment in 1986, courts have construed "proceeds" to mean gross receipts and not net profits of illegal activity consistent with the original intent of Congress.But in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:58 am
On the one hand, before he approves the proposed class action settlement, the United States District Court Judge in the O’Connor case is required by Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to determine whether the settlement is fair and adequate; information that appears to be relevant to this determination in the O’Connor case are such things as the most recent valuation of Uber as a company, as well as data on the number of miles logged by drivers,… [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
Court Ruling On May 31, 2023, Chief Judge Jon DeGuilio of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana in South Bend ruled that there was no such duty. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
Like me, she could not figure out why the taxpayer in Megibow v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:25 am
Reams, Inc., Internal Revenue Acts of the United States: The Revenue Act of 1954 with Legislative Histories and Congressional Documents at 1574-78.) [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:13 am
” In Muellenberg v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm
United States Three Russians named in the Trump dossier are suing the private investigation firm Fusion GPS for libel over the handling of the dossier. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:35 am
This writ was issued in Shipping and Transit, LLC v. 1A Auto, Inc., Case No. 9:16-cv-81039, in the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:49 am
Zamfir v. [read post]
