Search for: "United States v. Head" Results 1061 - 1080 of 6,163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2012, 8:58 am by Meir Feder
  It was aimed at the narrow category of law of nations violations (and treaty violations) for which the United States would be held responsible, and had the hard-headed purpose of averting adverse consequences in the dealings of the United States with the offended sovereigns. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:47 am by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Mar. 26 in the battle over access to a drug used in medication abortions, which account for over half of all abortions performed in the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm by Amy Howe
Mesa’s shot struck Hernández in the head, and he died on the spot. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
United States, 10-7515, for United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:49 am by Jamison Koehler
United States, 707 A.2d 781 (1998), the defendant turned over a loaded gun to security guards at the U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
Tapia is entitled to resentencing in United States v Tapia. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:39 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed, holding that the regulation does not pre-empt the claim asserted by the plaintiffs: [read post]
13 May 2013, 10:53 am by Greg Daugherty
Many commentators were surprised by the recent federal court of claims decision to deny summary judgment in Sutardja v United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner alleged that she was required to perform the out-of-title duty of supervising the entire child support unit without a concomitant increase in pay (see Matter of New York State Corr. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner alleged that she was required to perform the out-of-title duty of supervising the entire child support unit without a concomitant increase in pay (see Matter of New York State Corr. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by ernst
United States offered the narrower interpretation (head and land taxes), but the holding can be reconciled plausibly (although not perfectly) with our interpretation, while most other Supreme Court cases on the Direct Tax Clause align with our reading. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:52 am
The Court has a twofold role: first, to settle, in accordance with international law,legal disputes submitted to it by States; and, second, to give advisory opinions on legal questionsreferred to it by duly authorized United Nations organs and agencies of the system. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:45 am by bryannewland
Our tribes retained the right to fish in the ceded waters under that treaty; a fact that was confirmed in the landmark case of United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:38 pm by Clarence T.
Chicago, the United States Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms now applies against state and local governments, in addition to the federal government. [read post]