Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 1061 - 1080 of 23,747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2019, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Each of the respondents was detained for a period of time pending his or her removal from the United Kingdom pursuant to the Immigration Act 1971 of Schedule 2 paragraph 16(2). [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
  The Court of Appeal did not mention the fact that the largest baking company in the United States includes the word in its name - Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm by Joel R. Brandes
” Rufo testified that respondent is seeking asylum in the United States because she fears for her life in Mexico. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 12:58 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Dieter's defense to jurisdiction - that she did nothing in the United States - did not carry the day, according the Second Circuit.Read the Chicago Tribune's article for a summary of the case, and then the short Second Circuit opinion below.MacDermid v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 17th day of July, two thousand eighteen.PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS,REENA RAGGI,PETER W. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:44 am by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP
The “ministerial exception” is a religious protection based in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:04 am by Jon Robinson
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:10 pm by DMLP Staff
O’Brien Source of Law: MassachusettsVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: DefamationCourt Name: United States District Court, District of MassachusettsLegal Counsel: Kathleen A. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am by INFORRM
United States of America v Tuggle – did establishing three CCTV cameras, encircling a man’s house for 18 months violate his privacy rights per the Fourth Amendment? [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:18 am by JacksonWhite Law
The boys’ strategy involved breaking into Crook’s home, tying her up, and then tossing her off a bridge at a local state park. [read post]