Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 1061 - 1080 of 4,280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-8746; Greer v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:17 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Fall is back, and, in the United States, that means pumpkin-flavored products and (American) football galore. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
 However, all of these arguments have already been dealt with in courts, at least in the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 12:44 am by Florian Mueller
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to reconsider his decision to bar Huawei from enforcing a couple of Chinese patent injunctions prior to a San Francisco trial. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:00 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
It also examines the enforcement record of the United States Department of Justice regarding the provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 since the Act’s last reauthorization in 2006, and particularly since the Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Wade will be repealed (with abortion still possibly legal on a state-by-state basis) but whether the Court would invent a doctrine under which abortion would be constitutionally prohibited nationwide.Beyond abortion, I asked whether even Griswold v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 11:19 am by John Floyd
”   The current President of the United States, Donald J. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm by Kelsey Farish
Benefits of being an AGOA-approved country include certain trade preferences, including duty-free export of some goods into the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
” In other words, he thought Sure-Tan required the court to reconcile the NLRA and immigration law by excluding from NLRA coverage anyone who could not legally be hired in the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:00 am by Ben
Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. et al, case number 2:18-cv-01435, filed in the United States District Court Central District of California, claimed the two works were "in many ways identical". [read post]