Search for: "United States v. Miller" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Orin S. Kerr
United States holds that Miranda is a constitutional rule, not some sort of supervisory decision; and 42 U.S.C. 1983 provides that a person who "causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 6:06 am by Michelle Lindo McCluer
  As noted by our friends at CAAFlog, we're currently seeing the Court grant quite a few Fosler trailer cases raising the issue below:WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
It is estimated that 250,000 people die each year in the United States as a result of medical malpractice according to the U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:14 am by David Ingram
It would also override the Supreme Court’s 1999 ruling in United States v. [read post]