Search for: "United States v. Oregon" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,612
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm by Roy Ginsburg
In adopting the ministerial exception, the Court distinguished its prior holding in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:09 pm by CHRISTINA NOH
United States Supreme Court Review: Privacy v. [read post]
In a decision reaffirming directors’ authority to determine executive compensation, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon has ruled that a suit against bank directors arising out of a negative “say on pay” vote should be dismissed. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm by WIMS
 Commerce's finding of "critical circumstances" means that if the agency imposes preliminary countervailing duties on March 2, the duties will apply to all imports of cells and modules from Chinese exporters that were brought into the United States starting December 3, 2011. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:35 pm by Jim Walker
Carnival, the United States Supreme Court required a passenger who lived in Oregon, and injured during a cruise from California to Mexico, to file suit here in Miami. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Now, as Broc Romanek reports, a federal district court has bounced one of these law suits: In a decision reaffirming directors' authority to determine executive compensation, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon has ruled that a suit against bank directors arising out of a negative "say on pay" vote should be dismissed. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:30 am by Kali Borkoski
United States Law Offices of Mitchell N. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:24 am by Ed Wallis
Prescription drugs may not be sold in the United States unless they are first approved by the FDA. [read post]