Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 1061 - 1080 of 24,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2014, 3:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the abstract: The Indian Tribes of the United States occupy an often ambiguous place in our legal system, and nowhere is that ambiguity more pronounced than in the realm of state taxation. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm by Sandy Levinson
How, if he becomes president, might the civil war begin, since there will certainly be no Fort Sumter to signal the beginning, and the California vote for secession apparently won't take place until 2019. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The National Immigration Project, along with Kids In Need of Defense (KIND), Public Counsel, Bet Tzedek Legal Services, and Goodwin Procter represent the plaintiffs in this case, who came to the United States as unaccompanied children (UC) and whose asylum applications would have been rejected by U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:24 am by Paul Venard
The United States Supreme Court will soon hear a case which will hopefully clarify the relationship of a person’s First Amendment rights and federal anti-terrorism laws. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 6:04 pm by Mike Danko
  It allows suit to be filed against an airline in a U.S. court only if either: The passenger's ticket was issued in the United States; The passenger's journey was a round trip that started in the United States or was a one-way trip that ended in the United States;  The airline is incorporated in the United States;   The airline's principal place of business is in the… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
That stance is at odds with the US Supreme Court decision in United States v Jones (January 23, 2012), about which I posted yesterday. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Shareholder Advisory Vote on Electioneering Contributions Whereas, the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
This imports the sequencing familiar in the Chevron context from United States v. [read post]