Search for: "United States v. State of Michigan" Results 1061 - 1080 of 3,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2009, 3:12 pm
Additionally, the court held that the fact that the child brought more personal belongings with her than usual, in anticipation that she would remain in the United States was evidence of a settled purpose to reside in the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:15 am by WIMS
Because the preferred site contained streams and wetlands protected under Federal law, several groups (collectively, Hillsdale) brought challenges to a dredge and fill permit issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) under the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Kate Howard
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
Kanaan, 278 Mich.App 594, 751 NW2d 57 (Michigan Supreme Court 2008).People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
Among the tens of thousands of tattooers working in the United States, the tiny handful who have brought copyright infringement claims are rare outliers. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:12 am
The Eleventh Circuit wasted little time in applying AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:38 am by Steven Cohen
Macomb, County of et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Michigan – April 23rd, 2019) involves the death of a woman who died as a result of acute sepsis while service a thirty-day sentence on an outstanding bench warrant at the Macomb County Jail. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 3:45 pm by David Klein
On September 25, 2024, 1-800-LAW-FIRM, PLLC (“Defendant”) was sued in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for allegedly violating the automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS”) and National Do Not Call (“DNC”) registry compliance provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:40 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and the part of McConnell v. [read post]