Search for: "V D"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 76,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 3:08 am
Brownbill and others v St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 903; [2011] WLR (D) 264 “Once an employment tribunal had found that there were terms in women’s contracts and terms in men’s contracts that were susceptible to comparison and that each of the terms was a distinct provision with sufficient content to make it possible to compare them so that the benefits conferred by the provision could be… [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:12 am
The Cour d’Appel de Paris found the defendant liable and awarded relief to the plaintiffs prohibiting the defendants from using the photographs subject to an astreinte (a French injunction tool). [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:44 am
The magazine lost an appeal in its "The Park Cities Welfare Queen" case (D Magazine Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
27 May 2018, 2:05 pm
(U.S.S.C., March 20, 2018, Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:48 pm
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:27 am
O’Connell v Judicial Authority of Santa Cruz de Tenerife [2010] WLR (D) 26 “It was unjust or oppressive by reason of the passage of time, within the meaning of s 14 of the Extradition Act 2003, to order pursuant to a European arrest warrant the extradition of a person to serve the balance of a sentence of imprisonment after his sentence had twice been extended on appeal, rendering him unlawfully at large, where the requesting authority had without good reason delayed… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:22 am
O’Byrne v Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd [2010] UKSC 23; [2010] WLR (D) 137 “In a claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 based on the rights conferred under Council Directive 85/374/EEC concerning liability for defective products, which by art 11 required proceedings to be brought against the producer within ten years of the product being put into circulation, domestic law could not allow the producer to be substituted as the defendant outside that period in place of a… [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:22 am
O’Byrne v Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd [2010] UKSC 23; [2010] WLR (D) 137 ”In a claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 based on the rights conferred under Council Directive 85/374/EEC concerning liability for defective products, which by art 11 required proceedings to be brought against the producer within ten years of the product being put into circulation, domestic law could not allow the producer to be substituted as the defendant outside that period in place… [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:47 am
Othman (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 290; [2008] WLR (D) 103 “The deportation of a foreign national on the ground that his presence was not conducive to the public good because he was a danger to the national security of the United Kingdom would breach that person's right to a fair trial under art 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms if in the receiving state he was at… [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:43 am
Murray (by his litigation friends, Murray and another) v Express Newspapers plc and another [2007] EWHC 1908 (Ch D) “Routine activities conducted in a public place, such as walking down the street or visiting the shops, did not attract any reasonable expectation or guarantee of privacy so that an individual who had been photographed in a public place could not rely on the right to respect for his private and family life under art 8 of the European Convention for the… [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 7:23 am
Timothy D. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:28 am
Orchard v Lee and another [2009] EWCA Civ 295; [2009] WLR (D) 130 “A child at school playing a game in an authorised play area who was not breaking any rules and who was not acting beyond the norms of the game would not have anticipated that some significant personal injury would result from his actions [...] [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:47 am
Gichura v Home Office and another; [2008] WLR (D) 164 “Once a disabled detainee had gone through the administrative stage on arrival at a detention centre the services subsequently provided came within the scope of s 19(2) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 2:32 am
Tabernacle v Secretary of State for Defence [2009] EWCA Civ 23; [2009] WLR (D) 35 “Para 7(2)(f) of the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) Aldermaston Byelaws 2007, which prohibited the right of any member of the Women’s Peace Camp to camp within controlled areas on land owned by the Secretary of State for Defence to protest against [...] [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:03 am
Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11; [2009] WLR (D) 65 “Where a local housing authority summoned one of its tenants, who had been abusing and threatening one of his neighbours, to a meeting at which he was told that he could face eviction if his behaviour did not improve and the tenant left the [...] [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 2:09 am
Seaga v Harper (No 2) [2009] UKPC 26; [2009] WLR (D) 212 “Success fees under conditional fee agreements, and premiums paid on ‘after the event’ (’ATE’) insurance cover were not recoverable as costs by a successful party in an appeal to the Privy Council from Jamaica whose domestic law did not allow conditional fee agreements or [...] [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:54 am
Regina v Chaytor and others [2010] UKSC 52; [2010] WLR (D) 311 “Parliamentary privilege did not pose any bar to the prosecution of defendants charged with false accounting who, while serving Members of Parliament, made claims for expenses and allowances to the Fees Office of the House of Commons. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:26 pm
The text of the complaint: Jonathan Lee Riches ©, Plaintiff v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:31 am
Thorner v Major and others [2009] UKHL 18; [2009] WLR (D) 111 “Oblique assurances by a farmer of an intention to leave a farm to a cousin, who had worked full-time without any remuneration on the farm for 29 years, could constitute a sufficiently clear and unequivocal representation to establish a proprietary estoppel when the farmer [...] [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:06 am
Akhurst v Director of Public Prosecutions; [2009] WLR (D) 96 “University grounds and buildings were not an enclosed area within the meaning of s 4 of the Vagrancy Act 1824. [read post]
