Search for: "Washington v. US et al" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2007, 3:31 am
The filing (download here) came in the case of Abdah, et al., v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:25 pm
The filing (download here) came in the case of Abdah, et al., v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 3:40 pm
Kennedy, Jr., in District Court in Washington in the case of Abdah, et al., v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 2:55 pm
Township of Galloway; Opinion Invalidating Residency Restriction Ordinance (February, 2007)Southern Center for Human Rights: Wendy Whitaker, et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:32 am
(The Court took no action on Tuesday on a conditional cross-petition, Parker, et al., v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:02 am
(The Court took no action on Tuesday on a conditional cross-petition, Parker, et al., v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:57 pm
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE RALPH BAZE ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
Creation of South-West Lake Maxinkuckee Conservancy District, et al., a 20-page opinion, Cheif Judge Baker writes:Appellant-intervenor John Crist appeals the trial court's order creating the South-West Lake Maxinkuckee Conservancy District (the Conservancy District). [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
As a matter of full disclosure, Joondeph also served as a consultant for the State and Local Legal Center in the preparation of its amicus brief for the Government Finance Officers of America et al. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:01 am
  The case involves Mohammed Rahman, a habeas petitioner in District Court case 05-359 (Alhami, et al., v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Reynolds, et al. -- immunity of wholesale discount prices to challenge under Robinson-Patman Act solely because they are available to all buyers. 06-1617, Gilles v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:08 am
Our latest effort to feature interesting cert. petitions pending at the Supreme Court is Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Albany, et al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
Sarich et. al., rendered last week, the Washington Supreme Court overruled the trial court and decided, based upon the plain wording of the relevant statutory provision (RCW, 61.24.100(1)), that the foreclosure of a senior deed of trust does not extinguish the debt/obligation of any junior lienholder or otherwise preclude an action to recover that debt. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
Sarich et. al., rendered last week, the Washington Supreme Court overruled the trial court and decided, based upon the plain wording of the relevant statutory provision (RCW, 61.24.100(1)), that the foreclosure of a senior deed of trust does not extinguish the debt/obligation of any junior lienholder or otherwise preclude an action to recover that debt. [read post]