Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 6,882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2018, 6:04 am
But so construed, the statute reaches both true threats—such as "don't arrest me or I'll hit you"—and threats to take wholly lawful actions—such as "don't arrest me or I'll sue you. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:21 am
You can't stand there in silence, so you really do have to object again even though case law says you don't have to. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 9:19 am
And punishments should be decided by judges and juries, not algorithms (although if we're honest, that process is really controlled by prosecutors and certainly isn't immune from racial bias).But using risk assessments to decide pretrial detention is a horse of a different color, because the alternative is that money bail is required of all. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 7:51 pm
We don't know what more the government should have done, given the nature of the alleged fraud. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 2:38 pm
Given that our transaction produces a surplus, and given that efficiency considerations don't dictate how that surplus is to be divided, why can't we say that some divisions of the surplus are unfair? [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 5:01 am
And many cases explain we don't use hindsight to second-guess the reasonableness of the defendant's decisions in the heat of the moment. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
I don't see an increase in abuse of process claims lying head based on preservation letters being sent. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:47 am
And the goodies don't end there. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
It's true you don't get a U-visa for endangerment charges, but still, a jury might find the (alleged) change of story relevant and material.Again, the standard is abuse of discretion, so you're going to have a hard time arguing that a trial court made the wrong "403" call on relevance versus prejudice. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 8:54 am
They don't have to deal with clients, and rarely deal with lawyers. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 8:49 pm
On second thought, don't bother. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:37 pm
" Yet, this does not take into account the many gun crimes that involve people trying to protect themselves or highly emotional situations where young people don't think about the consequences of their actions. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:44 pm
So I tried to look it up.Only I still don't have a definitive answer. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:18 pm
We don't always wind up there in the end, but we aspire for as long as we can, and we work from the beginning to keep our clients' names as much out of the papers and off the internet as possible. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 8:48 am
And all of us can speak about Lemorin's immigration case, so long as we don't touch on the facts of underlying criminal case. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
If I did have the discretion, this is something that I would strongly consider doing for you, but I don’t believe that I have the legal ability to do it. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 8:47 am
I really don't mind if you sit this one out. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:54 am
Marshals Service, been deliberately deceiving judges and defendants about their use of a controversial surveillance tool to track suspects, according to newly obtained emails.At the request of the Marshals Service, the officers using so-called stingrays have been routinely telling judges, in applications for warrants, that they obtained knowledge of a suspect’s location from a “confidential source” rather than disclosing that the information was gleaned… [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
I don’t know, and my colleagues don’t either. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 5:31 am
Keller's opinions on innocence couldn't garner one additional vote. [read post]
