Search for: "Wheeles v. Wheeles" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2016, 11:33 am by Stuart Brooks, Olswang LLP
The images show certain parts of the design (including its wheels and strap) in darker shades than the main body. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:41 am
The Trunki caseThe key cases relevant to these questions were Proctor & Gamble v Reckitt Benckiser [2007] EWCA Civ 936, in which it was held that a registered design based on a line drawing was for the shape alone, and Samsung v Apple [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, in which Apple had contended that lack of ornamentation was a feature of the simple line drawing of a tablet which they had registered as the design. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 6:30 am by John-Paul Boyd
A little while ago, I gave a presentation to the National Judicial Institute‘s annual family law conference on the more important innovations in family justice introduced in British Columbia over the past decade, and in preparing my paper I realized something that struck me as terribly important. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 11:25 am by Dean Freeman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury’s award of $3 million in damages in Brown v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 8:09 pm by Andrew Delaney
Vermont Human Rights Commission v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:49 am by Allred & Allred
A jury in Mobile recently assigned guilt to a man behind the wheel of a pickup truck involved in a fatal crash in 2014. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:49 am by Allred & Allred
A jury in Mobile recently assigned guilt to a man behind the wheel of a pickup truck involved in a fatal crash in 2014. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:49 am by Allred & Allred
A jury in Mobile recently assigned guilt to a man behind the wheel of a pickup truck involved in a fatal crash in 2014. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:49 am by Allred & Allred
A jury in Mobile recently assigned guilt to a man behind the wheel of a pickup truck involved in a fatal crash in 2014. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:00 am by Jani Ihalainen
He concluded that "...the design claimed in this case was for a wheeled suitcase in the shape of a horned animal, but that it was not a claim for the shape alone, but for one with a strap, strips and wheels and spokes in a colour (or possibly colours) which contrasted with that of the remainder of the product". [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
This morning Lord Neuberger handed down the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in the Trunki case, PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12. [read post]