Search for: ". Kerr" Results 1081 - 1100 of 6,253
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2017, 5:32 am by SHG
Orin Kerr called this “hyperventilating. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:00 am
"Against the positive law model in the Carpenter cell-site case": Orin Kerr has this post at "The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:02 am by NCC Staff
Alex Abdo of the Knight First Amendment Institute and Orin Kerr of George Washington Law debate whether warrantless searches and seizures of cellphone records violate the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 9:17 am by Will Baude
(Photo by Jonathan Newton / The Washington Post) Another Supreme Court case I’ve been following this fall is co-blogger Orin Kerr’s favorite, Carpenter v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 10:18 am by Garrett Hinck
And Orin Kerr discussed four considerations to supplement his amicus brief in Carpenter v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
United States": Orin Kerr has this post at the "Lawfare" blog. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
One such Oklahoma company that benefitted was The Kerr-McGee Corporation. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 7:06 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Folks like Orin Kerr who insist that only legislation is an appropriate solution are IMO disingenuously using the distinction to argue for doing nothing. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
Supreme Court Judgment Lady Hale, with whom Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes agreed, gave the leading judgment. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 5:45 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Orin Kerr at The Volokh Conspiracy has this post, which also links to the debate: I argued that accessing those records is not a “search” of the cell-phone users, while Alex Abdo (formerly of the ACLU, now of the Knight... [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:36 am by Orin Kerr
Warren Demesme, who seemingly asked for a lawyer while being interviewed by police. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
In July 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes) heard this appeal relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]