Search for: "AC v. State" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,882
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
However, in principle, the question of negligence is a matter for the Claimants to establish but the question of inevitability is, as stated in Manchester Corp v Farnworth for Thames Water to establish. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
However, in principle, the question of negligence is a matter for the Claimants to establish but the question of inevitability is, as stated in Manchester Corp v Farnworth for Thames Water to establish. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:30 pm by Matthew Bush
The petition of the day is: Michigan Workers’ Compensation Agency v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:35 am by INFORRM
Judgment In this judgment, after setting out the background Tugendhat J considered submissions made as to his statement in his earlier judgment that “trial with a jury will generally be ordered as a matter of discretion, in particular where the state, or a public authority, is a defendant” [35] He accepted that, in the light of cases such as H v Ministry of Defence ([1991] QB 103) and Racz v Home Office ([1994] 2 AC 45)  he should have omitted the… [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:00 am
 The ACS case also provides a lesson in the dangers of potentially overreaching in a weak trade secrets case, as well as the power of the "David v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:50 am by Rosalind English
They based their claim on Article 3 but relied by analogy on the high duty to investigate that arose under article 2 of the ECHR when a suicide had occurred as illustrated in R(Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2003] and in R (L (A Patient)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] AC 588. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/K08f5j (Michelle L’Hommedieu) Blogging, Proportional Review and Predictive Coding - bit.ly/JbCFQs (Ralph Losey) Budgeting for E-Discovery: The Big 5 Expenses - bit.ly/K06hSw (Bill George) Car ‘Black Box’ Recorders Provide Evidence for Personal Injury Suits - bit.ly/IUCYAL (Thomas Scheffey) Communication is King in E-Discovery Matters - http://bit.ly/ISDly8 (Daniel Garrie) Court Denies Criminal Defendant’s Attempt to… [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:09 pm by Ariel Katz
The complaint alleged “systematic, widespread, and unauthorized copying and distribution of a vast amount of copyrighted works”, and argued that GSU “has facilitated, enabled, encouraged, and induced Georgia State professors to upload and post to these systems - and Georgia State students simultaneously to download, view, print, copy, and distribute - many, if not all, of the assigned readings for a particular course without limitation. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
RBK&C conceded that if a need for assistance was found then there would be a potential breach, following R (Limbuela) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
RBK&C conceded that if a need for assistance was found then there would be a potential breach, following R (Limbuela) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
RBK&C conceded that if a need for assistance was found then there would be a potential breach, following R (Limbuela) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:41 am by INFORRM
David Richards J held that this would therefore have involved a significant departures from two fundamental common law principles: first, the principle of open justice requires that trials are conducted in public; and, second, the principle of natural justice includes the right of a party to know the case against him and the evidence on which it is based (relying on Al Rawi v The Security Service [2011] UKSC 34 (13 July 2011) [10]-[13] (Lord Dyson); and later, in respect of open justice, to… [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]