Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 1081 - 1100 of 3,607
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm by kgates
(c) The mandatory initial discovery replaces the initial disclosures otherwise required by Rule 26(a)(1). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:26 pm by Brian Lebrecht
It is this last requirement, contained in Rule 12h-3(c), that has prompted issuers to seek no-action relief from the staff. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
On the other hand, what matters is not whethe [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:21 am by <ADMINNICENAME>
(h)(1) A court may order counseling to address underlying matters surrounding the visitation issue under this section if: (A) Counseling is available; (B) Both parties agree to participate in counseling; and (C) One (1) or both of the parties agree to pay for counseling. (2) Records, notes, reports, or discussions related to the counseling shall not be used by the court to determine visitation under this section. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:18 am
&nbsp; Rather, the claims that C-61 style reforms are urgently needed is simply a matter of bait and switch since the failed C-61 (modeled on the U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Genesis: G-d said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:19 am by emagraken
(g)      The Trust Award on Behalf of the Plaintiff’s Friends and Family This, too, is not a matter that, in my view, should be dealt with by way of particulars, with this exception:  The individual or individuals for whom a trust award is claimed should be identified in the statement of claim where the trust award is advanced. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:57 am
Clark (1906) 126 Ga. 484 [54 S.E. 1022]; 3 LaFave, Search and Seizure (3d ed. 1996 & Supp. 2003) § 35.1(g).) [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Side City Studios Inc., 2016 QCCA 1810 [63] En acceptant de procéder comme il l’a fait, c’est-à-dire sans gérer le dossier ni fixer l’audition de la demande d’injonction interlocutoire, le Tribunal a compromis les droits des appelants Limouzin, Larouche et BLU. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
” In addition, the Executive Order prioritizes the removal of individuals who: (a) Have been convicted of any criminal offense; (b) Have been charged with any criminal offense that has not been resolved; (c) Have committed acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense; (d) Have engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation in connection with any official matter or application before a governmental agency; (e) Have abused any program related to receipt of public benefits;… [read post]
23 May 2023, 9:46 am by Marianna Drake and Lisa Peets
If you have questions about the AI Act, or other tech regulatory matters, we are happy to assist with any queries. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:51 am
The matter was then referred to the Cabinet. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 5:18 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
” In addition, the Executive Order called for the removal of individuals who: (a) Have been convicted of any criminal offense; (b) Have been charged with any criminal offense that has not been resolved; (c) Have committed acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense; (d) Have engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation in connection with any official matter or application before a governmental agency; (e) Have abused any program related to receipt of… [read post]