Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 1081 - 1100 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am by ASAD KHAN
Fifth, the local authority’s decision can only be challenged by judicial review which is costly and narrow and is a poor replacement for an appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber). [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:28 pm by Justin F. Keith
Supreme Court, in a 5-3 decision, issued its much-awaited opinion in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 11:17 am by Bill Raftery
Some background: New Hampshire, like several other states, grants its legislature (or a single chamber) the power to request advisory opinions of its state supreme court. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:28 am by INFORRM
In deciding this question, the Court had regard to the Grand Chamber’s judgment in Perinçek v Switzerland [2015] ECHR 907 [26]-[27], which stated that Article 17 only applies ‘on an exceptional basis and in extreme cases’ and, further, that the decisive point under Article 17 is whether ‘the applicant’s statements sought to stir up hatred or violence, and whether by making them he attempted to rely on the Convention to engage in an… [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:00 am by Jeffrey Kahn
On May 23, two distinguished Queen’s Counsel squared off before a Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in a rare inter-state case on the court’s docket, Georgia v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm by David Smith
Spencer v Taylor [2013] EWCA Civ 1600This case was flagged recently on the Arden Chambers eflash service. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:00 am by Jeff Carroll
This past summer, I worked as a judicial extern in the chambers of Judge Joseph Van Bokkelen, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:05 am by INFORRM
  The Supreme Court rejected the first, put forward in Spiller v Joseph ([2010] UKSC 53), which argued for a reform of the law of honest comment in libel so that the defendant’s state of mind would be wholly irrelevant and the test would only depend upon the objective criterion. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:15 am by Kiran Bhat
In an op-ed in the Washington Post, George Will urges the Court to grant cert. in Harmon v. [read post]