Search for: "Character v. State"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 6,776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2020, 6:36 am
Norris v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 12:55 pm
Max, Obodo v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
In the Gambia v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:13 pm
The court says these allegations are enough to state a claim, so it rejects Hertz’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:47 am
In State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 5:50 am
Per Jones v. [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 8:40 am
State,849 N.E.2d 556, 562 (Ind. 2006); Williams v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:47 pm
Garnier and Lindke v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Sarver v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 4:44 am
DC Comics (2003) 30 Cal.4th 881 and Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
An earlier domestic judgment, R v Zardad, also supported the position that a person acting on behalf of a non-State entity may be acting in an official capacity for the purposes of s 134 if the non-State entity “had a sufficient degree of organisation, a sufficient degree of actual control of an area and […] exercised the type of functions which a government or governmental organisation would exercise” [63]. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 9:10 am
Case citation: Denison v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:25 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So says the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Davis v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
The Divisional Court had little difficulty in answering the case stated in the negative. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:56 pm
In Mahmoud v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:27 pm
Guest post by Shubha Ghosh and Erika Ellyne This post compares and contrasts the United States approach to patentable subject after last term’s Alice v CLS decision, with that in the European Union. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:10 am
The Court recalled that Article 56 §1 EC lays down a general prohibition on restrictions on movements of capital between member States (see, Case C-112/05 Commission v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:28 am
S. 103, and United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm
On Monday, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals heard argument in Awad v. [read post]
