Search for: "Clarence Thomas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,837
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2020, 9:36 am
Justice Clarence Thomas filed an opinion in which he agreed with the court’s conclusion that the board members’ appointment did not violate the Constitution, but he rejected what he described as the “ill-defined path that the Court takes to reach this result. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:01 am
Justice Clarence Thomas issued a concurring opinion, in which Justice Neil M. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 6:31 am
State Bar of Wisc., No. 19–831, Justice Clarence Thomas issued a dissent, in which Justice Neil M. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court has allowed the revised rule to take effect, the U.S. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
Abbasi, Justice Clarence Thomas, citing scholarly commentary, wrote separately “to note my growing concern with our qualified immunity jurisprudence,” which he maintained had been “completely reformulated … along principles not at all embodied in the common law. [read post]
26 May 2020, 11:08 am
” Moreover, three justices – Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch – indicated that they would have granted the government’s request. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:38 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost notes that in a recent documentary, “Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas recalls … that he viewed court-ordered busing in school desegregation cases in the 1970s as flawed and wrong-headed and still does”; Jost argues that “[a]s Supreme Court justice over the past 30 years, … Thomas has fallen victim to the same error: he has… [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm
The court denied cert, but Justice Clarence Thomas was moved enough to write an opinion dissenting from the denial, acknowledging a circuit split and arguing that the issue “deserves our review. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:11 am
Most signs point to a favorable evolution, as there was plenty of engagement, including from Justice Clarence Thomas, who has seldom spoken in the past. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:05 am
’” Also for the Times, Nicholas Casey reports that “[a]mong certain conservatives, an idea has started to take hold: Could Justice Clarence Thomas ever be the kind of pop-culture icon to his followers that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has become to hers? [read post]
18 May 2020, 11:43 am
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the denial of review. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:31 am
Garrett, No. 19–867, Justice Clarence Thomas issued a dissent from the denial of certiorari. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:55 am
The surprises included the full participation of Justice Clarence Thomas, the toilet flush heard around the country, and the knowledge that, like many of us, some justices forgot to unmute their phones at times. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Justice Clarence Thomas then asks whether there is any implied congressional power to request private documents. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Sineneng-Smith, “Justice Clarence Thomas suggested that a major First Amendment doctrine should be abandoned, and that the right to free speech be significantly shrunk in the process. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm
Answering a question from Justice Clarence Thomas, he stressed that although Congress can seek information relevant to legislation that it might be considering, such information should normally be “forward-looking” or “aggregated information,” rather an effort to “reassemble a precise factual history. [read post]
12 May 2020, 10:11 am
This constitutional fight over text, history, and original understanding seems tailor-made for the "originalists" among the Justices—Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, and, to a lesser degree, Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:00 am
He lost in state courts, but the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:41 pm
For Rassbach, this meant answering questions like the one he received from Justice Clarence Thomas, who pressed him to explain how a court would determine whether an employee performs an important religious function. [read post]
