Search for: "Class Action Defense"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 12,819
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
Superior Court (Marshalls) The post Class Action Defense Cases – Williams v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 5:09 am
Accordingly, the federal court granted the defense motion to dismiss the class action complaint, but granted plaintiff leave to amend. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 12:11 pm
The district court granted the defense motion to dismiss the class action’s sixth cause of action, and then declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the class action’s remaining state law claims and, accordingly, dismissed the class action complaint in its entirety. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 11:59 am
In this video, Jerry Maatman – partner at Seyfarth, co-chair of the firm’s class action defense group, and author/editor of the Report – discusses the genesis of the Report. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:07 am
Defense attorneys moved to dismiss the class action on the grounds that the claims were time-barred as they allegedly arose in the 1980s; the district court held that the discovery rule did not toll the statute of limitations and dismissed the class action complaint. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 8:09 am
Plaintiffs filed a motion for certification of the litigation as a class action; simultaneously, the parties were negotiating a potential settlement of the class action claims. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 3:18 pm
The Court found that “individualized questions with respect to consent, which will likely be Google’s principal affirmative defense, are likely to overwhelm any common issues” Accordingly, it held that none of the proposed classes could satisfy the requirement that common issues of law predominate over individual issues for a case to proceed as a class certification.The Court found that a putative Google Apps for Education class of plaintiffs… [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 4:16 am
As in Killingsworth, defense attorneys moved to dismiss Sawyer’s class action on the ground that no private right of action existed; the federal court agreed and dismissed Sawyer’s class action. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:43 am
Defense attorneys opposed any class action treatment. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:06 am
Defense attorneys removed the class action to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA). [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:49 am
The remaining defendants opposed class action treatment, and the district court agreed with defense attorneys that class action certification was not warranted. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:02 am
Often, when a class of workers petitions for conditional certification in FLSA collective action, and such certification is granted, it usually is for the entire class being asked for. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 12:09 pm
After summarizing the standard governing certification of class actions, see In re ConAgra, at 4-6, the district court noted that defense attorneys challenged only Rule 23(a)’s typicality requirement for class action certification and Rule 23(b)(3)’s superiority requirement for class action certification, id., at 6. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Pennsylvania does not recognize cross-jurisdictional class action tolling even where the class action was certified. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
Finally, the district court rejected defense arguments that the PSLRA’s “safe harbor” provision warranted dismissal of the class action. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:21 am
This panel offered the insights of a federal district court judge, defense counsel and plaintiffs’ counsel regarding Class Action Procedure, focusing on trends regarding the class certification process. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 12:08 pm
The state court granted the motion, and defense attorney removed the class action to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA). [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 5:05 am
In granting the defense motion to dismiss the class action complaint, the district court explained that under National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
Deterrence alone can justify a class action. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 5:21 am
Defense attorneys removed the action to federal court on the basis of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), id. [read post]
