Search for: "Class Action Defense"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 11,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
Finally, the district court rejected defense arguments that the PSLRA’s “safe harbor” provision warranted dismissal of the class action. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:41 am
As Rancho Cucamonga foreclosure defense attorneys, we know class-action lawsuits over the Home Affordable Modification Program have fared less well in courts than individual claims. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Pennsylvania does not recognize cross-jurisdictional class action tolling even where the class action was certified. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:06 am
Defense attorneys removed the class action to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA). [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 3:18 pm
The Court found that “individualized questions with respect to consent, which will likely be Google’s principal affirmative defense, are likely to overwhelm any common issues” Accordingly, it held that none of the proposed classes could satisfy the requirement that common issues of law predominate over individual issues for a case to proceed as a class certification.The Court found that a putative Google Apps for Education class of plaintiffs… [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:56 am
Defense attorneys moved for summary judgment as to all of the class action claims; the district court granted the motions as to the promotion and hostile work environment claims, but denied the motions as to plaintiff’s discriminatory and retaliatory pay disparity claims. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
The post Adecco Faces Class Action Lawsuit for Failing to Pay Final Wages to Workers first appeared on McCormack Law Firm. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 5:05 am
In granting the defense motion to dismiss the class action complaint, the district court explained that under National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
Defense attorneys removed the class action to federal court, id., at 1-2. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:21 am
This panel offered the insights of a federal district court judge, defense counsel and plaintiffs’ counsel regarding Class Action Procedure, focusing on trends regarding the class certification process. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 5:21 am
Defense attorneys removed the action to federal court on the basis of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), id. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
Turning to plaintiff’s motion to certify a class action, the district court began with the defense argument that the class action complaint prays for rescission but “a TILA plaintiff seeking a declaratory judgment that she is entitled to rescission may not utilize the class action mechanism. [read post]
23 May 2007, 6:18 am
The federal court rejected defense arguments that the class action claims were not justiciable, but granted the motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 12:38 pm
Indeed, the grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court in Alig is itself a signal that this defense is one that should not be discounted by defendants finding themselves the subject of class action litigation. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:23 pm
Defense attorneys raised several arguments, but we focus only on the claim that the district court should not have permitted the litigation to proceed as a class action. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
(Both McCollins and Smith predated the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), which now makes it somewhat easier to remove class actions from state to federal court.) [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
Deterrence alone can justify a class action. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:34 pm
Plaintiffs moved the trial court to certify the litigation as a class action, id., at 5. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 4:47 am
As noted above, defense attorneys removed the putative class action to federal court, and the district court granted a defense motion to compel plaintiffs to arbitrate their claims on an individual basis, upholding the enforceability of the class action waiver. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:13 am
From the defense perspective, this is the latest attempt at a “no injury” class action where no actual injuries or damages exist. [read post]
