Search for: "Cooper v. State" Results 1081 - 1100 of 8,564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2022, 7:09 am by Eric Goldman
Jan. 10, 2022) Selected Related Posts About State Action Claims One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm by NARF
(Federal Question; Indian Gaming Regulatory Act) Cooper v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Do (or should) the implications of the ratification process, Texas v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:03 pm by mhpslaw
Factors that Work Against Relocation In relocation disputes, as illustrated by Mackey v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am by centerforartlaw
For the decision, the Chamber stated the following: “…five mitigating circumstances, namely: (i) your admission of guilt; (ii) your cooperation with the Prosecution; (iii) the remorse and the empathy you expressed for the victims; (iv) your initial reluctance to commit the crime and the steps you took to limit the damage caused; and, (v) even if of limited importance, your good behavior in detention despite your family situation. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am by centerforartlaw
For the decision, the Chamber stated the following: “…five mitigating circumstances, namely: (i) your admission of guilt; (ii) your cooperation with the Prosecution; (iii) the remorse and the empathy you expressed for the victims; (iv) your initial reluctance to commit the crime and the steps you took to limit the damage caused; and, (v) even if of limited importance, your good behavior in detention despite your family situation. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am by Rosalind English
If this reciprocity can’t be implemented or enforced, cooperation collapses. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:44 pm by Steven Cohen
  In addition, the defendant states that Moseley did not ask Cooper key questions about her job duties. [read post]
20 May 2020, 7:08 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
A Western Federal District Court rejected an effort by a carrier to remove a Covid-19 Business Interruption Insurance coverage case in the matter of Danoia's Eatery, LLC v. [read post]