Search for: "Crop v. Crop"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 4:31 am
Starbucks crops up twice in my presentation. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:11 am
Speaking from Malaysia, Sarojeni V. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
We know that pathogens can live on green crops a very long time, so therefore it is very important to improve knowledge for prevention. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:00 am
We are pleased to welcome fellow blogger and attorney Charley Foster from Planet Kauai in a discussion of State v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:30 am
” 18 One of the merits of great advocates, as Lord Pearce pointed out in Rondel v Worsley [1969] 1 AC 191 at p 255G, has been the ability ruthlessly to sacrifice nine points and win on the tenth and best. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:48 am
Another crop of three:In United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:54 pm
W & J Harlan Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 2:27 am
In re Imax Securities Litigation, 2011 WL 1487090 (quoting Bluebird Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
(City of Claremont v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
The complaint cites Justice Story's dicta in Lowell v Lewis (1817) which stated that inventions that are "injurious to the well being, good policy, or sound morals of society" are unpatentable. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:22 am
An interesting constitutional point cropped up in the General Court's decision in Case T? [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:28 am
The point of R.A.V. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Freeze v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:18 am
(KEI) (Patently-O) (The Prior Art) (Patent Law Practice Center) (EFF) (Patent Docs) US farmers sue Monsanto over GMO patents, demand right to conventional crops (IP Watch) (IP Biz) US: BIO commends launch of House patent reform process: Expresses concern with inter partes review changes (PatentlyBIOtech) US: Oncolytics files for correction of PTA calculation for ‘Reoviruses having modified sequences’ patent (Patent Docs) Products Akatinol (Memantine) – EU: AG offers… [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:24 am
Furthermore, because abortion is a constitutional right (with significant limitations) under Roe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 2:35 am
In DeCook v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:34 pm
Monsanto GMO Suit The case, Organic Seed Growers & Trade Ass’n, et al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
161/10 eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez et Robert Martinez v Société MGN Limited. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:54 am
Law Firm Investment Portfolios built on Ron and Toby’s work, a post by V. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
[The IPKat thinks this is a really interesting question, despite its irrelevance in this particular situation, and suspects that it will re-emerge in the future when issues like secondary liability and exemption from liability for service providers crop up]. [read post]
