Search for: "D & W Corporation" Results 1081 - 1100 of 2,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2014, 3:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
  As discussed here, on November 25, 2013, Northern District of Georgia Judge Thomas W. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:53 am by Barry Barnett
[W]hat Professor Coates’ work and methodology require us to do is look past the Court’s rhetoric and image to what is actually happening in the cases—and what is interesting to see is that even in the high-profile lottery cases, the Court demonstrates a similar lack of understanding about how business and corporations work. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm by Marty Lederman
Lee, that "[w]hen followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity,” at least where “[g]ranting an exemption . . . to an employer operates to impose the employer’s religious faith on the employees. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
© as for corporations: Sure, some corporations benefit. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:36 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
See, e.g., BETWEEN INVENTION AND INNOVATION: AN ANALYSIS OF FUNDING FOR EARLY STAGE TECHNOLOGY DVELOPMENT (2002) (w/ Philip Auerswald); Taking Technological Risks: How Innovators, Executives, and Investors Manage High-Tech Risks (MIT 1991) (w/ Philip Auerswald), http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/1760/taking_technical_risks.html [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 13-1280Issue: (1) Whether the Court of Appeals erred in upholding the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s post hoc rationalization in litigation that, under 29 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:10 am by Lindsay Griffiths
 But corporate law departments don't WANT to be change agents - they'd prefer to be brought forward by law firms. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:43 am
”  In the Matter of a Warrant to Search A Certain E–Mail Account Controlled and Maintained by Microsoft Corporation, 2014 WL 1661004 (U.S. [read post]