Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 4,076
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2016, 3:24 am
Today, the court will hear oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:36 pm
Earlier this year, McDonald v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 12:12 pm
In a Ninth Circuit en banc case called Huntsman v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 7:45 am
In 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:42 am
The case is, Steele V Steele, and it was approved for publication today as I write this on, April 30, 2021. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
So, provided that absolute and relative grounds serve different purposes -– the protection of (i) a general interest and of (ii) the individual trade mark holder -- the AG stated that the relevant public has only one overall impression of the mark -- but that, for absolute grounds of refusal of registration the focus is on possible connections between the mark or its components and the goods and services covered while, for relative grounds, the focus is on the process of… [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 10:30 am
The antitrust rules included in the TFEU, such as those against anti-competitive agreements, abuses of dominant position, certain problematic mergers and state aid, are essential to achieve that free movement. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
R (DA & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (expedited) was heard on 17 until 19 July 2018. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm
Golden v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:23 am
Nessle v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:37 am
Or stated another way “this court has no basis for declining jurisdiction”. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:21 am
And Dennis V. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 7:46 am
And unlike Martinez and the subsequent decision in Trevino v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm
Lexmark and Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
Bell v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
In the case of Gross v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:36 pm
(Basu v. [read post]
18 Mar 2006, 1:48 am
In Evans v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:31 am
“[V]irtually all the state police … [and] also the local police … can get [the exemption] and the feds can’t. [read post]
