Search for: "Deter v. Deter"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 5,286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2020, 10:56 am
Something similar, though with more risk of violence, arose in NAACP v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm
Macovei was ordered to pay damages of 10,000 lei (around 2,300 euro), and to publish the judgment at her own expense in five national newspapers, holding it would ‘deter the applicant from committing similar acts in the future’. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:56 pm
Riley Seyfarth Synopsis – Following a familiar fact pattern, after a named Plaintiff filed a putative class action in Bird, et al. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
FLASHBACK FRIDAY In a 2019 essay in The Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti, professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, analyzed the Supreme Court’s ruling in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:06 pm
Sullivan (S.D.N.Y.) in Hughes v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 12:42 pm
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon Straus summarized the latest developments in Trump V. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:23 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:22 am
More generally, I fear that elections don’t reflect the people’s true sentiments due to voter suppression, where literally millions of voters are deterred from voting or disenfranchised entirely. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:22 am
The case, Hasiuk v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court handed down its decision in June Medical Services v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:20 am
« Back to newsSubscribeThe post United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
Mexico has just adopted a terrible new copyright law, thanks to pressure from the United States (and specifically from the copyright maximalists that hold outsized influence on US foreign policy). [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm
The facts of Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) help demonstrate this. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Trump’s partisan interests at the expense of fairness in our legal system.Such conduct is exactly what 27 leaders of the DC bar are seeking to deter during a critical time when the Justice Department should remain scrupulously neutral. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Payne v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:48 pm
The case is Pimentel v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:27 pm
"] From Usherson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:38 am
In State v. [read post]
