Search for: "Doe Nos."
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,061
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2023, 3:42 am
In re The New York Times Company, Serial Nos. 90106071, 90112154, 90112577, 90115155, 90115491, and 90115337 (March 30, 2023) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Angela Lykos). [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:30 am
In both cases, the Court of Appeals indicated that it does not matter how far along in the adoption process the putative father gets the order of filiation, nor does it matter whether he provided no support to the child or the mother.In re MGRIn re MGR (Docket Nos. 338286 and 340203, issued 2/27/18) is a published and binding decision. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:26 am
"In both contexts, the Cole Memorandum lacks the force of law and “does not and cannot override the CSA. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
Nos. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 3:48 am
” In re I-Coat Company, LLC, Serial Nos. 86802467, 86802618, and 86802733 (June 7, 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
Supreme Court, Case Nos. 11–338 and 11–347. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
Nos.47, 117). [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:37 am
” The City’s consultant, Historic Resources Group (“HRG”) issued a 2018 report concluding that the 2017 remodel project met some of the Secretary’s standards (Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, and 8), but not others (Nos. 2, 3, 5, 9, and 10). [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
The opponent’s submission that there is no disclosure that any-one has applied the known method to this particular situation does not necessarily establish that there was a prevailing opinion that this could not be done. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
The first seven counts involved allegations of sexual assault against Jane Doe I, a.k.a. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:58 am
They are the consequence of ignoring the second of Benedict Evans’ “nos. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Patent Nos. 5,699,038 (’038 patent), 6,147,592 (’592 patent), and 7,538,659 (’659 patent). [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:58 am
The decision of the First Circuit in In re Nexium Antitrust Litig., Nos. 14-1521, 14-1522, 2015 U.S. [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:04 pm
., UI Hearing Nos. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:21 am
For all that, the United States does remain a wild card. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:58 pm
FDA has already received several citizen petitions (Docket Nos. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 2:50 pm
City of San Mateo, Nos. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
Provisional Application Nos. 60/147,324, filed Aug. 5, 1999 and 60/164,650, filed Nov. 10, 1999. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:38 am
Nos. 2295726 and 2318677 as a trademark for its own goods; that the DVD LOGO is used by third parties; and that the DVD LOGO no longer identifies a single source for the goods with which the mark is used. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 11:47 pm
Midland Funding, LLC, Nos. 15-11240, 15-14116 (11th Cir. 2016) would be a good starting point. [read post]
