Search for: "Doe v Great Expectations"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 3,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:56 am
The Court held that the LLP Act established a wholly new form of entity, which “may be expected to have its own corporate governance structures”. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:50 am
By Daniel RichardsonHoule v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:43 pm
Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
The Nurses testified they had expected to be paid the salaries listed in the performance reviews and their supervisor did not inform them they would be compensated at an hourly rate. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Johnson has been very critical of the Obama Administration for caving in to financial interests and he continues his criticism: The real news is that the administration does not want to take on these financial lobbies. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:45 pm
Howard, does not have a valid claim to make. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
In Great Oaks Water Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 4:04 am
Lord Neuberger set out six points of guidance which would apply 'in the great majority of cases'. 1. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 4:04 am
Lord Neuberger set out six points of guidance which would apply 'in the great majority of cases'. 1. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
People v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:59 am
That is a great loss to our profession and only will fu [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 8:30 am
The case was T & A Textiles v Hala Texile UK Ltd and others, and it was heard before Mr Douglas Campbell sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
Consider that in Wilson v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:02 am
So does Qualcomm--but Apple doesn't. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:28 am
Most recently, in 2013, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held in the ACLU class action Rodriguez v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 5:14 am
This is obviously a great start by any measure. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 3:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 3:47 am
DowntownDC Business Improvement District v. [read post]
