Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 12,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2007, 1:37 pm
HB 690 states as follows: (1) "Employee" means individuals employed in Ohio, but does not mean individuals who are excluded from the definition of "employee" under 29 U.S.C. 203(e) or individuals who are exempted from the minimum wage requirements in 29 U.S.C. 213 and from the definition of "employee" in this chapter. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 7:21 am
Was seriously argued that storage and printing out does not constitute reproduction?]. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:21 pm
Despite Section 2-205(1)(B), none of S’s fractional interest is included under Section 2-207(a)(2) because that provision does not apply to fractional interests required to be included under Section 2-207(a)(1)(A). [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:42 pm
Doe) the Plaintiff was involved in three separate collisions and sued for damages. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 2:55 pm
., which does business as HMC Farms, is voluntarily recalling peaches, plums and nectarines sold in retail stores between May 1 and November 15, 2022 and between May 1 and November 15, 2023. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm
While the premise of the legislation is that U.S. companies have been furiously moving domestic jobs offshore, job loss data from the Department of Labor does not support the claim that offshoring is a significant factor in mass layoffs. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:48 am
Nov. 29, 2010). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:36 pm
§ 171.098(a)(1) (West 2011) (party may appeal an order denying an pplication to compel arbitration under section 171.021); see Tex. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Does my employer need to file a new labor for Redmond, WA? [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 3:49 pm
The ultimate hearing then gets scheduled for January 29, 2019. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 12:00 pm
Therefore, we approve of paragraphs-22 and 29 of Garware (supra). [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 8:40 am
Oral argument was held on March 29, 2021.The petition is No. 20-1161. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
Williams WPC-1, Inc., 332 F.3d 316 (5th Cir. 2003). [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:31 pm
What does it matter? [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 4:51 pm
Against All Defendants and DOES 1-50) 25. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:10 am
In that respect, the court noted (as also previously stated by the EUIPO) that, according to settled case-law, the application of Article 7(1)(c) of the EUTMR does not depend on the existence of a real, current or serious need to leave a sign free. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:45 am
Claim 1, Novelty[...]5. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:09 am
This period is not extendable.One might ask if a voluntary publication under 1.221 does "count" as a publication under 35 USC 1.22(b) which states in pertinent part:(b) PUBLICATION.-(1) IN GENERAL. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 9:08 pm
Id. at *1. [read post]
8 May 2016, 8:12 am
Does, (2d Cir., May 6, 2016), the 2nd Circuit reversed the district court and held that a Muslim inmate plausibly alleged a free exercise violation stemming from several of his Ramadan meals being served to him before sunset.In Bradford v. [read post]
