Search for: "Does 1-58"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2009, 8:30 am
NMa is all about what constitutes a concerted practice according to Article 81 §1 EC. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
If a work of art doesn’t meet all three of these requirements, then it does not qualify for copyright protection. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
If a work of art doesn’t meet all three of these requirements, then it does not qualify for copyright protection. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am
Since the Romanian Government does not give any reason why recognition should not be granted, there should be no obstacle to automatic recognition. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:41 am
” This led to what the internet does best: a viral story about nothing of particular consequence. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:03 pm
(So does that mean that an after business hours approval by FDA does not become effective until the next business day?) [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:17 am
In particular, the UK Government referred to: (1) Article 4(2) in the Treaty of the European Union (TEU) which states that “national security remains the sole responsibility of each Member State”; and (2) Article 1(3) of the ePrivacy Directive which states that the ePrivacy Directive “does not apply to activities that fall outside of the TEU…such as…activities concerning public security, defence, State security”. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
This was approved by Sullivan CJ in the Irish Supreme Court in Sinclair v Gogarty [1937] IR 377 (see also Gallagher v Tuohy (1924) 58 ILTR 134 (Murnaghan J); Connolly v Radio Telifís Eireann [1991] 2 IR 446 (Carroll J); Reynolds v Malocco [1999] 2 IR 203, [1999] 1 ILRM 289, [1998] IEHC 175 (11 December 1998) (Kelly J)); and it represents the law in Australia (Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [2006] HCA 46 (28 September 2006)), Canada (Champagne v… [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:43 am
Last spring, I did a post – Trojan Horse Warrant – Fail? [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 4:40 pm
(Hayes v Willoughby [2013] 1 WLR 935). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:15 pm
’ Mot. to Continue Abeyance, ECF No. 58. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 1:52 pm
This provides that the interpretative obligation in section 3(1): “(a) applies to primary and subordinate legislation whenever enacted; (b) does not affect the validity, continuing operation or enforcement of any incompatible primary legislation; and (c) does not affect the validity, continuing operation or enforcement of any incompatible subordinate legislation if… [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:13 pm
See IGT, 370 NLRB No. 50, slip op. at 2; Baylor, 369 NLRB No. 43, slip op. at 1–2. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
See Figure 1. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:40 am
It does not mention protection from active sales in general. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
Pp. 23–62. (1) It is undisputed that petitioners Koch and Nash—two ordinary, law-abiding, adult citizens—are part of “the people” whom thevSecond Amendment protects. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
Pp. 23–62. (1) It is undisputed that petitioners Koch and Nash—two ordinary, law-abiding, adult citizens—are part of “the people” whom thevSecond Amendment protects. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 11:07 am
” Beal Bank, 780 So.2d at 58–59. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm
The overtime provision of this section does not apply to: … F. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:31 pm
Koppers, Inc., 2006 WL 2228910, at *1 (N.D. [read post]
