Search for: "Felts v. State"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 5,742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
In ASARCO v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
An effort that may well be worthwhile if you've ever felt yourself on the hot seat at oral argument. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm
The circumstances would lead an objectively reasonable person believe that the officers required their attention and that they could not simply depart. . . .Finally, although the dialogue between Paul and Officer Kumlander appears to have been non-confrontational in tone and language up to the point when Paul stated that he was a parolee, this is not strong evidence to conclude that a reasonable person would have felt at liberty to terminate the encounter with the officer. . . . [read post]
KY: Pulling down handcuffed defendant's pants to search for crack felt in a patdown was unreasonable
13 Nov 2008, 6:31 pm
State, 2008 Ind. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:17 am
Just in time for exam-writing law professors comes the Seventh Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:13 pm
Fast forward to 2012, where the Missouri Supreme Court found otherwise in State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:13 pm
Fast forward to 2012, where the Missouri Supreme Court found otherwise in State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:49 am
She claims she was upset and felt uncomfortable, injured and humiliated by his behavior. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 5:01 am
Ruti Smithline of Morrison & Foerster used U.S. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 9:04 am
Newsom v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 7:25 am
In the case, Peden v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 7:25 am
In the case, Peden v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 8:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 9:05 am
Miles v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:51 am
., LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Denton (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 333, 359, the Court of Appeal ruled that, once a company learned that the State of California felt it was in violation of Proposition 65, it didn't have to wait for the ax to fall: it could sue the State for declaratory relief that it wasn't violating the statute. [read post]
