Search for: "Fish v. United States"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2008, 12:15 pm
United States, No. 06-87L (Apr. 15, 2008), where the landowner sought compensation after the Fish and Wildlife Service designated property as critical habitat for the Mississippi Sandhill Crane. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:41 am
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 10:20 am
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:36 pm
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Department of Fish & Wildlife, S217763. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am
In the culverts subproceeding ofUnited States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 10:54 am
United States, 543 F.3d 1276 (Fed. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:35 am
[3] https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/on-this-day-in-1924-all-indians-made-united-states-citizens [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
Multi-Jurisdictional Relief The Aker v Neptune case provides a practical example of the current multiple forms of relief concurrently available to both patentee and infringer, particularly following new “challenge” procedures introduced by the United States Patent and Trade-mark Office (“USPTO”) last September 2012. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 2:04 pm
John Doe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:43 am
Finally, on behalf of the United States, Frederick Liu, assistant to the U.S. solicitor general, argued that equitable apportionment should apply to interstate groundwater just as it applies to interstate rivers and fish. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
District Court for the District of Columbia handed down an opinion in the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 4:28 am
” At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the recent cert grant in Benisek v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:25 am
On Monday morning, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Barton v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
State of Minnesota
• US v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:31 am
United States, in which the Court will consider the case of a commercial fisherman charged with violating federal anti-obstruction laws after he threw several undersized fish overboard. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:00 am
Koepp v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:01 am
On Friday, the Senate approved a bill – crafted in response to the Court’s decision last Term in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
