Search for: "Folks v. Folks" Results 1081 - 1100 of 4,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2019, 12:05 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
That law makes it impossible to do automated mass face-scanning of photos without the consent of everyone depicted, which de facto means that all face-scanning is illegal even if many folks would consent. __ Case citation: B.F. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 10:08 am
According to Connecticut court records the plaintiff has withdrawn its action in the matter of Lisa Macomber et al. v Travelers Property and Casualty et al. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
They also stopped the folks in the car. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm by Eric Goldman
A couple of years ago, a few folks claimed that algorithmic activity by social media providers was materially different than the conditions prevailing in 1995 when Congress adopted Section 230, and therefore Section 230 should be not be available for these new technological developments. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:04 am
I would venture to guess that the folks behind Psystar may be bankrolling Open Tech as well. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 10:45 pm
I have reason to believe a lot of folks are waiting on that verdict; I've noticed quite a few hits on my own blog by people searching for terms like "tiffany ebay verdict," despite the fact that I mentioned the Tiffany v. eBay case only once, quite briefly, in December. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm by Jeff Gamso
Gross addressing how Oklahoma gets to go about killing folks. [read post]
6 May 2013, 8:06 am
Lots of folks responded to that - it turns out that nullification is a popular topic. [read post]