Search for: "Ford v. Wells" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am by Derek T. Muller
Ford Federal Direct Loan Program, the Federal Family Education Loan Program, and Graduate PLUS Loans) who completed an award at the indicated field of study. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm by Edward J. Balleisen
Supreme Court has more consistently restricted the interpretive flexibility of agencies, especially in some pivotal environmental cases such as West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:20 pm
V FOR VENDETTA by Alan Moore and David Lloyd The book is probably one of the best graphic novels ever produced. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 5:27 am
In cleaning up some old files, I ran across the text of a speech I gave back in 2004 at Syracuse law school on the business judgment rule. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (Afro-IP),If education and pricing policy fail, says Adobe in Nigeria, we can still sue: (Afro-IP),South African arm of Chrysler objects to advertisement by Indian vehicle maker Mahindra and Mahindra that uses the term "jeep": (Afro-IP), (Spicy IP),Kenya’s call for anti-counterfeit legislation… amongst other changes: (Afro-IP),Kenya: Shared computer use raises privacy, confidentiality issues: (Afro-IP)AustraliaChanges to grace period for trade mark renewal:… [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) Several months ago I posted a draft syllabus for a new course on Corporate Social Responsibility (Corporate Social Responsibility Law--A Tentative Syllabus). [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 1:41 am
In conclusion, Jacoby discussed tarnishment, in the form of Anheuser-Busch v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
And this is so even if one makes the mistake of agreeing with Scalia and his colleagues that the Constitution grants that right to individuals, not well-organized militias.The Second Amendment does not say some arms, but only the most unhinged advocates would say that the Constitution permits private ownership of heavy artillery or nuclear weapons. [read post]