Search for: "HAND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,616
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
This analysis alone should give pause to those who triumphed in announcing that they had prevailed by a 3-2 vote.In his separate opinion concurring partly in those of Justices Hearn and Pleicones, Chief Justice Beatty voted in favor of reversing the trial court's legal conclusion (following the rule handed down in the Waccamaw case -- see the previous post) that the Dennis Canon could not create an effective trust in South Carolina. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
This analysis alone should give pause to those who triumphed in announcing that they had prevailed by a 3-2 vote.In his separate opinion concurring partly in those of Justices Hearn and Pleicones, Chief Justice Beatty voted in favor of reversing the trial court's legal conclusion (following the rule handed down in the Waccamaw case -- see the previous post) that the Dennis Canon could not create an effective trust in South Carolina. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
United States on a 5-4 vote. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 10:16 am
State and Federal Systems of Criminal Justice Of course, there are two independent systems of criminal justice operating in Texas: those of the state and the federal jurisdiction. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 12 May 2022, a ruling on serious harm and defamatory meaning was handed down in Wilks v Qu [2022] VCC 620. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
United States On 24 August Reuters had an article “Sarah Palin can sue New York Times for defamation – court ruling”. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
Some of the background can be found in an article entitled “Right of Reply: A Comparative Approach” [pdf] by Andras Koltay, who also discusses the position in the United States and Canada. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:08 am
From the onset of United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
Unfortunately, the kind of GPSfeatured in this summary doesnot come with detailed maps State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, as articulated in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am
That’s why, in Utah v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
After her oath, Justice Barrett offered remarks, which I have done my best to transcribe: Thank you all for being here tonight, and thank you, President Trump, for selecting me to serve as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
After her oath, Justice Barrett offered remarks, which I have done my best to transcribe: Thank you all for being here tonight, and thank you, President Trump, for selecting me to serve as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Second, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 3:29 pm
“They are ‘owned by, produced by or for, or . . . under the control of the United States Government. . . . [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
In Harris, the Justices questioned the foundation for the precedent, established in Abood v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:55 pm
Indeed, in our dealings with the Inquiry, we were keen to stress that there was a wide variety of potential mechanisms that might be adopted to balance the interests of national security, on the one hand, with the need for the Inquiry to be as transparent and open as possible, on the other. [read post]
