Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 19,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2017, 8:24 am
The case was unusual as all parties agreed that the arbitrator hearing the case as a grievance under the collective agreement was empowered to consider all remedies including human rights, common law and arbitral jurisprudence. [3] Tl’azt’en First Nation v Joseph, Canada Labour Code Adjudication [4] Pate v Galway Ontario Superior Court, trial level 2009 on first instance [5] Downham v Lennox County 2005 Ontario Superior Court [6] Lau v Royal… [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:27 am
There is no judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (“the European Court”) which establishes an obligation to recognise a gender category other than male or female, and none which would require the Secretary of State to issue passports without any indication of gender. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
3 May 2009, 8:05 am
In Haines v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:57 am
GangulySupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Remdeo Chauhan @ Rajnath Chauhan v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 12:23 pm
The state planted another defendant in his cell as a "human listening device," even though Ventris’ right to counsel had attached. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:40 am
This question is now before the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Dareskizb v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:35 am
Dunn v Parole Board [2008] EWCA Civ 374; [2008] WLR (D) 110 “In the context of CPR Pt 11, the limitation provisions within s 7(5) of the Human Rights Act 1998 provided a defence to a claim rather than going to jurisdiction, so that a failure to apply to strike out within 14 days of acknowledging service did not preclude a defendant from applying to strike out a claim on the basis of limitation. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
RFAL allows decision-makers to certify any human rights claim, i.e. even in cases without any criminality and liability to deportation. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 5:35 pm
The fourth section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered a remarkable judgment in the case of L.B. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:33 pm
In Barbulescu v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:33 pm
In Barbulescu v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
As the 8th District’s decision a couple weeks ago in State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:38 am
Within that whole is it not "an affront to human dignity," Abbate v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
On April 20, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm
In Conway v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
Its 5-4 ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
