Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 5:31 pm
In Chovan v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:18 am
She and her husband filed suit in federal district court but the wife's claims were compelled to arbitration and the husband's claims were abated pending the arbitration. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:01 am
A recent case, Villegas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:30 pm
Eventually, the trial court ordered sanctions against Husband which required him to pay Wife’s attorneys fees and costs. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
The remaining two issues - whether the trial court abused its discretion when it failed to award spousal support to the husband, and whether any evidence supported the trial court's award of appellate attorney's fees to the wife - were not affected by the acceptance-of-benefits doctrine because they did not concern the division of the community estate. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 9:51 am
It ended up paying $5,600 for wife’s injuries. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 8:40 am
Bissell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:18 am
In Khan v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:36 pm
By Daniel RichardsonWelch v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:46 am
The parties were listed as husband and wife at the children's school. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:43 am
Memo. 2017-798, 2017 WL 1251018 Facts: Husband and wife were married in 1982. [read post]
12 May 2008, 11:11 am
After the QDRO was entered, the Judge recognized the ex-wife's right to receive 17% of the ex-husband's monthly pension. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:29 am
Upon his death, the plan paid the proceeds to the first wife, and the husband’s second wife sued to recovery the proceeds. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 2:24 pm
The Court held that her husband’s ex-wife was entitled to the proceeds as the result of an all too common mistake—he forgot to change his life insurance beneficiary after he divorced his previous wife. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 4:12 pm
The attorney advises her not to sign the agreement, and says she will speak to the husband’s attorney. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 11:04 am
Contrary to the ex-wife's arguments, the terms of that agreement do not violate the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 11:07 am
Had the wife chosen to do so, she could have sought information regarding the husband's income before signing the agreement. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 6:05 am
The court denies the ex-husband's current request for relief from an order entered in 1995, more than twelve years ago, compelling him to pay the ex-wife child support arrears. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 1:50 pm
He also wanted to terminate alimony based on the ex-wife's alleged cohabitation. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:37 am
The New Jersey divorce judge ruled that the ex-wife could buy out her ex-husband's interest in the former marital home based on its value in 1996 when the parties divorced, rather than at its value in 2003 when he demanded the sale of the home. [read post]
